lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [May]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: "Directly mapped persistent memory page cache"

* Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:

> > "Directly mapped pmem integrated into the page cache":
> > ------------------------------------------------------

> Nice, I think it makes sense as an area that gets reserved at file
> system creation time. You are not proposing that this gets
> automatically reserved at the device level, right? [...]

Well, it's most practical if the device does it automatically (the
layout is determined prior filesystem creation), and the filesystem
does not necessarily have to be aware of it - but obviously as a user
opt-in.

> [...] For the use cases of persistent memory in the absence of a
> file system (in-kernel managed hierarchical storage driver, or
> mmap() the pmem block device directly) there's still a need for
> pfn-based DAX. [...]

Yes, but knowing that there's a sane model we can take a hard stance
against pfn proliferation and say: 'we let pfns this far and no
farther'.

> [...] In other words, simple usages skip the overhead. They assume
> pfns only, discover those pmem pfns via ->direct_access(), and
> arrange for exclusive block device ownership. Everything else that
> requires struct page in turn requires a file system to have opt-ed
> into this reservation and provide pmem-struct-page infrastructure,
> pmem-aware-DIO etc.

Yes.

Thanks,

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-05-10 12:01    [W:0.165 / U:4.360 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site