[lkml]   [2015]   [Apr]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: use pmd_page() in follow_huge_pmd()
On Thu, 9 Apr 2015, Gerald Schaefer wrote:

> commit 61f77eda "mm/hugetlb: reduce arch dependent code around follow_huge_*"
> broke follow_huge_pmd() on s390, where pmd and pte layout differ and using
> pte_page() on a huge pmd will return wrong results. Using pmd_page() instead
> fixes this.
> All architectures that were touched by commit 61f77eda have pmd_page()
> defined, so this should not break anything on other architectures.
> Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer <>
> Cc: # v3.12

Acked-by: David Rientjes <>

I'm not sure where the stable cc came from, though: commit 61f77eda makes
s390 use a generic version of follow_huge_pmd() and that generic version
is buggy for s930 because of commit e66f17ff7177 ("mm/hugetlb: take page
table lock in follow_huge_pmd()"). Both of those are 4.0 material,
though, so why is this needed for stable 3.12?

 \ /
  Last update: 2015-04-09 22:21    [W:0.134 / U:2.196 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site