lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Apr]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCHv2 2/2] iio: dht11: Use new function ktime_get_resolution_ns()
On 07/04/15 12:12, Harald Geyer wrote:
> This cleans up the most ugly workaround in this driver. There are no
> functional changes yet in the decoding algorithm, but we improve the
> following things:
> * Get rid of spurious warning messages on systems with fast HRTIMER.
> * If the clock is not fast enough for decoding to work, we give
> up immediately.
> * In that case we return EAGAIN instead of EIO, so it's easier to
> discriminate causes of failure.
>
> Returning EAGAIN is somewhat controversial: It's technically correct
> as a faster clock might become available. OTOH once all clocks are
> enabled this is a permanent error. There is no ECLOCKTOOSLOW error
> code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Harald Geyer <harald@ccbib.org>
Looks good to me. Will wait for comments on the first patch though
before taking this... clearly that one will need a few acks if I take
it through IIO!

Jonathan
> ---
> changes since V1:
> call ktime_get_xxx() functions directly instead of using the wrappers
> of the iio subsystem.
>
> drivers/iio/humidity/dht11.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/humidity/dht11.c b/drivers/iio/humidity/dht11.c
> index 7d79a1a..4cb25dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/humidity/dht11.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/humidity/dht11.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/gpio.h>
> #include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> +#include <linux/timekeeping.h>
>
> #include <linux/iio/iio.h>
>
> @@ -87,23 +88,11 @@ static unsigned char dht11_decode_byte(int *timing, int threshold)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int dht11_decode(struct dht11 *dht11, int offset)
> +static int dht11_decode(struct dht11 *dht11, int offset, int timeres)
> {
> - int i, t, timing[DHT11_BITS_PER_READ], threshold,
> - timeres = DHT11_SENSOR_RESPONSE;
> + int i, t, timing[DHT11_BITS_PER_READ], threshold;
> unsigned char temp_int, temp_dec, hum_int, hum_dec, checksum;
>
> - /* Calculate timestamp resolution */
> - for (i = 1; i < dht11->num_edges; ++i) {
> - t = dht11->edges[i].ts - dht11->edges[i-1].ts;
> - if (t > 0 && t < timeres)
> - timeres = t;
> - }
> - if (2*timeres > DHT11_DATA_BIT_HIGH) {
> - pr_err("dht11: timeresolution %d too bad for decoding\n",
> - timeres);
> - return -EIO;
> - }
> threshold = DHT11_DATA_BIT_HIGH / timeres;
> if (DHT11_DATA_BIT_LOW/timeres + 1 >= threshold)
> pr_err("dht11: WARNING: decoding ambiguous\n");
> @@ -126,7 +115,7 @@ static int dht11_decode(struct dht11 *dht11, int offset)
> if (((hum_int + hum_dec + temp_int + temp_dec) & 0xff) != checksum)
> return -EIO;
>
> - dht11->timestamp = iio_get_time_ns();
> + dht11->timestamp = ktime_get_real_ns();
> if (hum_int < 20) { /* DHT22 */
> dht11->temperature = (((temp_int & 0x7f) << 8) + temp_dec) *
> ((temp_int & 0x80) ? -100 : 100);
> @@ -154,7 +143,7 @@ static irqreturn_t dht11_handle_irq(int irq, void *data)
>
> /* TODO: Consider making the handler safe for IRQ sharing */
> if (dht11->num_edges < DHT11_EDGES_PER_READ && dht11->num_edges >= 0) {
> - dht11->edges[dht11->num_edges].ts = iio_get_time_ns();
> + dht11->edges[dht11->num_edges].ts = ktime_get_real_ns();
> dht11->edges[dht11->num_edges++].value =
> gpio_get_value(dht11->gpio);
>
> @@ -170,10 +159,22 @@ static int dht11_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
> int *val, int *val2, long m)
> {
> struct dht11 *dht11 = iio_priv(iio_dev);
> - int ret;
> + int ret, timeres;
>
> mutex_lock(&dht11->lock);
> - if (dht11->timestamp + DHT11_DATA_VALID_TIME < iio_get_time_ns()) {
> + if (dht11->timestamp + DHT11_DATA_VALID_TIME < ktime_get_real_ns()) {
> + timeres = ktime_get_resolution_ns();
> + if (DHT11_DATA_BIT_HIGH < 2*timeres) {
> + dev_err(dht11->dev, "timeresolution %dns too low\n",
> + timeres);
> + /* In theory a better clock could become available
> + * at some point ... and there is no error code
> + * that really fits better.
> + */
> + ret = -EAGAIN;
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> reinit_completion(&dht11->completion);
>
> dht11->num_edges = 0;
> @@ -208,7 +209,8 @@ static int dht11_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
> ret = dht11_decode(dht11,
> dht11->num_edges == DHT11_EDGES_PER_READ ?
> DHT11_EDGES_PREAMBLE :
> - DHT11_EDGES_PREAMBLE - 2);
> + DHT11_EDGES_PREAMBLE - 2,
> + timeres);
> if (ret)
> goto err;
> }
> @@ -274,7 +276,7 @@ static int dht11_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - dht11->timestamp = iio_get_time_ns() - DHT11_DATA_VALID_TIME - 1;
> + dht11->timestamp = ktime_get_real_ns() - DHT11_DATA_VALID_TIME - 1;
> dht11->num_edges = -1;
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, iio);
>



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-04-09 15:41    [W:0.096 / U:0.400 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site