lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Apr]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    Patch in this message
    /
    From
    Subject[PATCH 3.4 033/176] KVM: s390: flush CPU on load control
    Date
    From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>

    3.4.107-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

    ------------------


    commit 2dca485f8740208604543c3960be31a5dd3ea603 upstream.

    some control register changes will flush some aspects of the CPU, e.g.
    POP explicitely mentions that for CR9-CR11 "TLBs may be cleared".
    Instead of trying to be clever and only flush on specific CRs, let
    play safe and flush on all lctl(g) as future machines might define
    new bits in CRs. Load control intercept should not happen that often.

    Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
    Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
    Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
    [lizf: Backported to 3.4:
    - adjust filename
    - adjust context]
    Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>
    ---
    arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c | 2 ++
    1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

    diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c b/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
    index 3614565..f10fef6 100644
    --- a/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
    +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
    @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ static int handle_lctlg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
    break;
    reg = (reg + 1) % 16;
    } while (1);
    + kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH, vcpu);
    return 0;
    }

    @@ -97,6 +98,7 @@ static int handle_lctl(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
    break;
    reg = (reg + 1) % 16;
    } while (1);
    + kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH, vcpu);
    return 0;
    }

    --
    1.9.1


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2015-04-09 12:41    [W:16.182 / U:0.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site