[lkml]   [2015]   [Apr]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v8] x86: mce: kexec: switch MCE handler for kexec/kdump
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 08:59:44AM +0000, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> I replied about testing. That might be tricky a little, but I hope it helps.

Yeah, whatever we do, we need this properly tested before upstreaming.
That's a given.

> Even if we raise tolerant level in running kdump, that doesn't prevent
> idling CPUs from running MCE handlers when MCE arrives, which makes memory
> accesses (losing information from kdump's viewpoint) and spits
> "MCE synchronization timeout" messages (unclear and confusing for users.)

Why? Those CPUs are offlined and num_online_cpus() in mce_start() should
account for that, no?

And if those are offlined, they're very very unlikely to trigger an MCE
as they're idle and not executing code.


ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.

 \ /
  Last update: 2015-04-09 12:21    [W:0.076 / U:1.780 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site