[lkml]   [2015]   [Apr]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 2/4] extcon: usb-gpio: add support for VBUS detection
Hi Robert,

On 04/09/2015 04:57 PM, Robert Baldyga wrote:
> Hi Chanwoo,
> On 04/09/2015 04:12 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> Hi Robert,


>> But, I have one question about case[3]
>> If id is low and vbus is high, this patch will update the state of both USB and USB-HOST cable as attached state.
>> Is it possible that two different cables (both USB and USB-HOST) are connected to one port simultaneously?
> It's because state of single USB cable connection cannot be completely
> described using single extcon cable. USB cable state has two bits (VBUS
> and ID), so we need to use two cables for single cable connection. We
> use following convention:
> cable "USB" = VBUS
> cable "USB-HOST" = !ID.

I think that extcon provider driver have to update the only one cable state
of either USB or USB-HOST because USB and USB-HOST feature can not be used
at the same time through one h/w port.

If extcon-usb-gpio.c update two connected event of both USB and USB-HOST cable
at the same time, the extcon consumer driver can not decide what handle either USB or USB-HOST.

> In fact it would be better to have cables named "USB-VBUS" and "USB-ID"
> - in this convention it would be more clear.

Chanwoo Choi

 \ /
  Last update: 2015-04-09 11:41    [W:0.116 / U:3.392 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site