Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 07 Apr 2015 11:48:07 +0200 | From | Luca Abeni <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: correct definition of density as C_i/min{D_i,P_i} |
| |
On 04/03/2015 09:47 PM, Luca Abeni wrote: > On Fri, 3 Apr 2015 19:57:37 +0200 > Henrik Austad <henrik@austad.us> wrote: [...] >> I realise that I've reviewed quite a lot of this, and I have some >> vague memories of this being discussed earlier, Juri? Luca? > I remember there was a discussion (and I seem to remember that the > symbol used for the period was changed at least one time, but I might > be wrong), but I do not remember the details. > > Next week I'll have some time for working on this; I'll search the old > emails and I'll try to reconstruct the discussion. Sorry, after searching in my old emails I've not been able to find references to this particular topic (T_i vs P_i). Maybe I lost some emails, or maybe I mis-remembered the old discussion...
Anyway, as I said I am fine with changing P_i in T_i if there is a general agreement.
Luca
| |