Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 4 Apr 2015 13:09:24 -0400 | From | Chris Metcalf <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] nohz: make nohz_full imply isolcpus |
| |
On 4/4/2015 10:10 AM, Rik van Riel wrote: >> Rik, what's the change you're proposing that's similar to this one? Thanks! > I don't have this particular one, and I like it. > > I know there are use cases where isolcpus= without > nohz_full= makes sense, but I cannot think of the > reverse. > > Acked-by: Rik van Riel<riel@redhat.com>
Thanks, I'll push it via the tile tree unless someone would prefer otherwise. (The tick_nohz_full_set_cpus() and tick_nohz_full_clear_cpus() routines are in earlier tile tree commits, the latter supporting a change to the tile network driver.)
Mike, I added your
Thumbs-Up-by: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> :-)
-- Chris Metcalf, EZChip Semiconductor http://www.ezchip.com
| |