Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 30 Apr 2015 08:24:15 -0700 | From | Daniel Phillips <> | Subject | Re: xfs: does mkfs.xfs require fancy switches to get decent performance? (was Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync?) |
| |
On 04/30/2015 07:33 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote: > Well ok, let's forget bad blood, straw men... and answering my question > too I suppose. Not having any sexy IO gizmos in my little desktop box, > I don't care deeply which stomps the other flat on beastly boxen.
I'm with you, especially the forget bad blood part. I did my time in big storage and I will no doubt do it again, but right now, what I care about is bringing truth and beauty to small storage, which includes that spinning rust of yours and also the cheap SSD you are about to run out and buy.
I hope you caught the bit about how Tux3 is doing really well running in tmpfs? According to my calculations, that means good things for SSD performance.
Regards,
Daniel
| |