lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Apr]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Module stacking next steps
On 04/29/2015 06:55 PM, James Morris wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>
>>
>> James, do you want to take the module stacking changes in through
>> the security tree? Are there remaining objections or concerns? What
>> procedure would you like to follow?
>
> What's the overall consensus on this -- do people generally see it as
> useful and necessary, and is it ready to go in?
>
> Any objections or concerns?
>
No objections, and I know there are several people interested in seeing
this land.

I am happy with the code, and my only concerns lie with things that this
explicitly doesn't support yet (ie. larger lsm stacking, secids, ...)




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-04-30 05:21    [W:0.298 / U:0.260 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site