Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 29 Apr 2015 19:45:11 -0700 | From | John Johansen <> | Subject | Re: Module stacking next steps |
| |
On 04/29/2015 06:55 PM, James Morris wrote: > On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Casey Schaufler wrote: > >> >> James, do you want to take the module stacking changes in through >> the security tree? Are there remaining objections or concerns? What >> procedure would you like to follow? > > What's the overall consensus on this -- do people generally see it as > useful and necessary, and is it ready to go in? > > Any objections or concerns? > No objections, and I know there are several people interested in seeing this land.
I am happy with the code, and my only concerns lie with things that this explicitly doesn't support yet (ie. larger lsm stacking, secids, ...)
| |