Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 29 Apr 2015 22:27:52 +0200 | From | Maxime Ripard <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] clk: dt: Introduce binding for always-on clock support |
| |
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 04:11:47PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote: > > > This useful binding should be accepted and people should not abuse > > > it. If they do and the vendor Maintainer's review and accept then > > > they have no foundation for recourse. > > > > > > Would you prefer it if I made the warning starker? > > > > Perhaps you can add a check for "clock-always-on" to scripts/checkpatch.pl, > > to make people aware they should think twice? > > That's a really nice idea! > > Maxime, would that make you happ(y|ier)?
Do whatever you want.
This binding is going to be merged no matter what, so my opinion has really little value here.
Maxime
-- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |