Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 29 Apr 2015 13:33:55 +0200 | From | Harald Hoyer <> | Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.1-rc1 |
| |
On 29.04.2015 01:12, John Stoffel wrote: >>>>>> "Havoc" == Havoc Pennington <hp@pobox.com> writes: > > Havoc> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> wrote: >>> I find dbus to be extremely hard to debug when my desktop starts doing >>> things I don't want it to do. The fact that it might be flinging around hundreds >>> of thousands of messages, and that this is something we want to encourage, > > Havoc> This particular argument doesn't resonate with me ... if dbus > Havoc> is hard to debug, it's not as if "ad hoc application-specific > Havoc> sidechannel somebody cooked up" is going to be easier. > > When Ted is saying it's hard to debug... then maybe it's a bit crappy > in design or implementation?
There is a very nice tool to debug the traffic for kdbus.
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dbus/2014-March/016178.html
Also the patched wireshark makes it as easy as analyzing network traffic.
| |