Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 23 Apr 2015 09:50:08 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/6] mtd: diskonchip: don't call nand_scan_bbt() directly | From | Rafał Miłecki <> |
| |
On 23 April 2015 at 02:30, Peter Pan 潘栋 (peterpandong) <peterpandong@micron.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 01:51:27PM +0000, Brian Norris wrote: >> >> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 02:11:24AM +0000, Peter Pan 潘栋 (peterpandong) >> wrote: >> > The diskonchip driver almost uses the default nand_base hooks as-is, >> > except that it provides custom on-flash BBT descriptors and avoids >> using >> > factory-marked bad blockers. >> > >> > So let's refactor the BBT initialization code into a private >> 'late_init' >> > hook which handles all the private details. Note the usage of >> > NAND_SKIP_BBTSCAN, which allows us to defer the BBT scan until we've >> > prepared everything. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> >> > Signed-off-by: Peter Pan <peterpandong@micron.com> >> >> Why are you just resending my patch? You could Ack/Review/Test it >> instead. (Did you test it?) > > My work is in the 6th patch. > I already tested the patch with micron own nand controller. I don't have > platform with docg4 or diskonchip controller. So the BBT and nand_base.c > part is covered while docg4.c and diskonchip.c not.
You can use patch format's comment place to post sth like "Depends on 5 XXX patches from Brian"
-- Rafał
| |