Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 21 Apr 2015 13:53:53 +0200 (CEST) | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Subject | Re: [patch 10/39] hrtimer: Use cpu_base->active_base for hotpath iterators |
| |
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> On 04/15/2015 02:38 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >>Now that we have the active_bases field in sync we can use it for > > This sentence appears a bit ambiguous. I am guessing you are referring > to what the first patch in this series did, in which case wouldn't it be > better if it is stated a bit more elaborately like 'Now that it is > guaranteed that active_bases field will be in sync with the timerqueue > on the corresponding clock base' ? It took me a while to figure out what > the statement was referring to.
Indeed. I'm going to rephrase that.
Thanks,
tglx
| |