lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Add cpu_(prepare|starting|dying) for core_pmu
Date
The core_pmu does not define cpu_* callbacks, which handles
allocation of 'struct cpu_hw_events::shared_regs' data,
initialization of debug store and PMU_FL_EXCL_CNTRS counters.

While this probably won't happen on bare metal, virtual CPU can
define x86_pmu.extra_regs together with PMU version 1 and thus
be using core_pmu -> using shared_regs data without it being
allocated. That could could leave to following panic:

BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
IP: [<ffffffff8152cd4f>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x1f/0x40

SNIP

[<ffffffff81024bd9>] __intel_shared_reg_get_constraints+0x69/0x1e0
[<ffffffff81024deb>] intel_get_event_constraints+0x9b/0x180
[<ffffffff8101e815>] x86_schedule_events+0x75/0x1d0
[<ffffffff810586dc>] ? check_preempt_curr+0x7c/0x90
[<ffffffff810649fe>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x24e/0x3e0
[<ffffffff81064ba2>] ? default_wake_function+0x12/0x20
[<ffffffff8109eb16>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x16/0x40
[<ffffffff810577e9>] ? __wake_up_common+0x59/0x90
[<ffffffff811a9517>] ? __d_lookup+0xa7/0x150
[<ffffffff8119db5f>] ? do_lookup+0x9f/0x230
[<ffffffff811a993a>] ? dput+0x9a/0x150
[<ffffffff8119c8f5>] ? path_to_nameidata+0x25/0x60
[<ffffffff8119e90a>] ? __link_path_walk+0x7da/0x1000
[<ffffffff8101d8f9>] ? x86_pmu_add+0xb9/0x170
[<ffffffff8101d7a7>] x86_pmu_commit_txn+0x67/0xc0
[<ffffffff811b07b0>] ? mntput_no_expire+0x30/0x110
[<ffffffff8119c731>] ? path_put+0x31/0x40
[<ffffffff8107c297>] ? current_fs_time+0x27/0x30
[<ffffffff8117d170>] ? mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat_from_page+0x20/0x70
[<ffffffff8111b7aa>] group_sched_in+0x13a/0x170
[<ffffffff81014a29>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0x10
[<ffffffff8111bac8>] ctx_sched_in+0x2e8/0x330
[<ffffffff8111bb7b>] perf_event_sched_in+0x6b/0xb0
[<ffffffff8111bc36>] perf_event_context_sched_in+0x76/0xc0
[<ffffffff8111eb3b>] perf_event_comm+0x1bb/0x2e0
[<ffffffff81195ee9>] set_task_comm+0x69/0x80
[<ffffffff81195fe1>] setup_new_exec+0xe1/0x2e0
[<ffffffff811ea68e>] load_elf_binary+0x3ce/0x1ab0

Adding cpu_(prepare|starting|dying) for core_pmu to have shared_regs
data allocated for core_pmu. AFAICS there's no harm to initialize
debug store and PMU_FL_EXCL_CNTRS either for core_pmu.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 9da2400c2ec3..0a61a9a021de 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -2533,6 +2533,10 @@ ssize_t intel_event_sysfs_show(char *page, u64 config)
return x86_event_sysfs_show(page, config, event);
}

+static int intel_pmu_cpu_prepare(int cpu);
+static void intel_pmu_cpu_starting(int cpu);
+static void intel_pmu_cpu_dying(int cpu);
+
static __initconst const struct x86_pmu core_pmu = {
.name = "core",
.handle_irq = x86_pmu_handle_irq,
@@ -2559,6 +2563,9 @@ static __initconst const struct x86_pmu core_pmu = {
.guest_get_msrs = core_guest_get_msrs,
.format_attrs = intel_arch_formats_attr,
.events_sysfs_show = intel_event_sysfs_show,
+ .cpu_prepare = intel_pmu_cpu_prepare,
+ .cpu_starting = intel_pmu_cpu_starting,
+ .cpu_dying = intel_pmu_cpu_dying,
};

struct intel_shared_regs *allocate_shared_regs(int cpu)
--
1.9.3


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-04-21 11:21    [W:0.093 / U:0.544 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site