lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Apr]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: sparc64: Build failure due to commit f1600e549b94 (sparc: Make sparc64 use scalable lib/iommu-common.c functions)
From
From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 14:38:44 -0400

> On (04/18/15 11:28), Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>
>> Some merge gone wrong, maybe ? I tried to revert f1600e549b94
>> and apply http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/459803/ instead.
>
> That patch is a part-2 of a 3-part patch set. In order, this should
> have been v10: applied as:
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/459804/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/459803/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/459802/
>
> The mail thread for the 3-part patch set was here
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/sparclinux/msg13785.html
>
> I noticed that the existing dates on the iommu commits were also odd:
>
> commit 671d773297969bebb1732e1cdc1ec03aa53c6be2
> Author: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com>
> Date: Thu Mar 12 20:02:37 2015 -0400
>
>
> commit f1600e549b948a32ad7672e069b2915314637ae3
> Author: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com>
> Date: Thu Mar 12 20:02:36 2015 -0400
>
> commit 10b88a4b17d31a7409494b179dcb76e7ab2fcaea
> Author: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com>
> Date: Thu Mar 12 20:02:35 2015 -0400
>
> We have had many discussions of this patch set since March 12,
> and the correct version should have been v10, dated something
> after Apr 9, and acked by Benjamin Herrenschmidt.

Dammit, somehow I applied V4 :-/

Sorry about that. I'll try to sort this out.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-04-18 21:41    [W:0.063 / U:0.484 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site