lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: AM335x OMAP2 common clock external fixed-clock registration
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:18:33AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:12:03AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> > On 17.04.2015 04:00, Michael Welling wrote:
> > >On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 01:23:50AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> > >>On 17.04.2015 00:09, Michael Welling wrote:
> > >>>On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:37:19PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> > >>>>On 16.04.2015 18:17, Michael Welling wrote:
> > [...]
> > >>>What would be the proper error path?
> > >>>What cleanup is required?
> > >>
> > >>A proper error path would be to release any claimed resource
> > >>on any error. If you look at the code, the only resources that
> > >>need to be released are the two clocks in question.
> > >
> > >So for every error return in the probe function and in the of si5351_dt_parse
> > >it needs to clk_put first right?
> >
> > Not quite. The driver should clk_put() every clock that it called a
> > [of_]clk_get() for. The thing is that clocks can be passed by
> > platform_data and we never claim them.
>
> I've always said clocks (as in struct clk) should never be passed through
> platform data.
>

What is the alternative for systems that still use the old platform files?

Hypothetically speaking of course.

> --
> FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
> according to speedtest.net.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-04-17 21:41    [W:0.055 / U:25.892 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site