Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 16 Apr 2015 15:26:14 -0400 (EDT) | Subject | Re: [PATCH] cpumask: remove __first_cpu / __next_cpu | From | David Miller <> |
| |
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 14:13:32 +0930
> [ Final grep before push to Linus revealed sparc used these directly, > please Ack. Against my cpumask-next tree. ] > > They were for use by the deprecated first_cpu() and next_cpu() wrappers, > but sparc used them directly. > > They're now replaced by cpumask_first / cpumask_next. And __next_cpu_nr > is completely obsolete. > > Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|  |