lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Apr]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] usb: chipidea: Use extcon framework for VBUS and ID detect
From
Date

Hi Robert,

On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 16:11 +0200, Robert Baldyga wrote:
> Hi Ivan,
>
> On 04/15/2015 03:35 PM, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> > On recent Qualcomm platforms VBUS and ID lines are not routed to
> > USB PHY LINK controller. Use extcon framework to receive connect
> > and disconnect ID and VBUS notification.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ivan T. Ivanov ivanov@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes since v0 [1], as per Peter Chen suggestions:
> >
> > * Moved external connector parsing code to ci_get_platdata()
> > * Moved external connector related variables to struct ci_hdrc_platform_data
> > * Rename ci_host_notifier() to ci_id_notifier()
> > * Fixed device bindings description
> > * Use select EXTCON framework, instead of depends on.
> >
> > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/9/116
> >
> > .../devicetree/bindings/usb/ci-hdrc-qcom.txt | 9 +++
> > drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig | 1 +
> > drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/usb/chipidea/otg.c | 26 ++++++-
> > include/linux/usb/chipidea.h | 17 +++++
> > 5 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci-hdrc-qcom.txt
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci-hdrc-qcom.txt
> > index f2899b5..c635aca 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci-hdrc-qcom.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci-hdrc-qcom.txt
> > @@ -7,6 +7,14 @@ Required properties:
> > - usb-phy: phandle for the PHY device
> > - dr_mode: Should be "peripheral"
> >
> > +Optional properties:
> > +- extcon: phandles to external connector devices. First phandle
> > + should point to external connector, which provide "USB"
> > + cable events, the second should point to external connector
> > + device, which provide "USB-HOST" cable events. If one of
> > + the external connector devices is not required, empty <0>
> > + phandle should be specified.
>
> Do you expect to have "USB" and "USB-HOST" notifiers supplied by two
> different extcon drivers? It looks strange. I don't think so that we
> ever will need to deal with such weird configuration.

Yes. That is what I have today on my desk.

>
> > +
> > Examples:
> >        gadget@f9a55000 {
> > compatible = "qcom,ci-hdrc";
> > @@ -14,4 +22,5 @@ Examples:
> > dr_mode = "peripheral";
> > interrupts = <0 134 0>;
> > usb-phy = <&usbphy0>;
> > + extcon = <0>, <&usb_id>;
> > };
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig b/drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig
> > index 5ce3f1d..5619b8c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/Kconfig
> > @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> > config USB_CHIPIDEA
> > tristate "ChipIdea Highspeed Dual Role Controller"
> > depends on ((USB_EHCI_HCD && USB_GADGET) || (USB_EHCI_HCD && !USB_GADGET) ||
> > (!USB_EHCI_HCD && USB_GADGET)) && HAS_DMA
> > + select EXTCON
> > help
> > Say Y here if your system has a dual role high speed USB
> > controller based on ChipIdea silicon IP. Currently, only the
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c b/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
> > index 74fea4f..e1d495d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
> > @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
> > #include <linux/delay.h>
> > #include <linux/device.h>
> > #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> > +#include <linux/extcon.h>
> > #include <linux/phy/phy.h>
> > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > @@ -557,9 +558,39 @@ static irqreturn_t ci_irq(int irq, void *data)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +static int ci_vbus_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,
> > + void *ptr)
> > +{
> > + struct ci_hdrc_cable *vbus = container_of(nb, struct ci_hdrc_cable, nb);
> > +
> > + if (event)
> > + vbus->state = true;
> > + else
> > + vbus->state = false;
> > +
> > + return NOTIFY_DONE;
> > +}
>
> Actually it's not true that "USB" cable state is equal to VBUS state.

But this is how it supposed to work right now, no?

I have to admit that the naming is really confusing.

> "USB" and "USB-HOST" are mutually exclusive, and when you have ID=0,
> which means "USB-HOST" is connected, "USB cable will be seen as
> disconnected even when VBUS=1.
>
> We are currently discussing how to pass VBUS state to USB OTG drivers.
> You can find discussion here:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg123895.html

Sure, I am following this discussion. When it settles down, I can change
this as appropriate, until then this is what we will have in 4.1.

It will be messy refactoring, I think. All extcon providers and consumers
are using strings to denote cable names. Not to mention that extcon-class
is using "USB-Host", while all others are using "USB-HOST".

Regards,
Ivan



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-04-15 17:21    [W:0.064 / U:3.172 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site