Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 14 Apr 2015 20:40:04 +0100 | From | Al Viro <> | Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.1-rc1 |
| |
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 09:32:29PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 09:24:29PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 09:23:57PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > You might not like the design, but it is a valid design. Again, we > > > don't refuse to support hardware that is designed badly. > > > > Yeah except the small difference that unlike this, we can't change > > hardware. > > And we can't change the design/implementation of many things, again, > it's not the kernel's job to prevent something, just because we don't > like the RFC, from being accepted.
Translate, please. What exactly will be prevented by NAK on your Fine Piece Of Software? Not dbus working as it does, surely?
|  |