lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Apr]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: Invitation and RFC: Linux Plumbers Device Tree track proposed
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Rowand, Frank
<Frank.Rowand@sonymobile.com> wrote:
> In recent years there have been proposed tools to aid in the creation of valid
> device trees and in debugging device tree issues. An example of this is the
> various approaches proposed (with source code provided) to validate device tree
> source against valid bindings. As of today, device tree related tools,
> techniques, and debugging infrastructure have not progressed very far. I have
> submitted a device tree related proposal for the Linux Plumbers 2015 conference
> to spur action and innovation in such tools, techniques, and debugging
> infrastructure.
>
> The current title of the track is "Device Tree Tools, Validation, and
> Troubleshooting". The proposal is located at
>
> http://wiki.linuxplumbersconf.org/2015:device_tree_tools_validation_and_trouble_shooting
>
> I am looking for several things at the moment:
>
> 1) Suggestions of additional topics to be discussed.

A few things on my list:

- Supported and not supported overlay usecases
- Tools for overlays - I think overlays has created new challenges in
validation and a need for new tools. How to test an overlay applies?
Generating a dtb from dts + overlay dts. Generating an overlay from a
diff of old and new dts (overlay as a way to update old dtbs)
- Shrinking the binding review fire hose. How to improve binding
documentation structure and review.
- Standardizing Android dtb handling. Appended DTB for arm64? Not
liked by upstream, but already in use.


> 2) Emails or other messages expressing an interest in attending the
> device tree track.
>
> 3) Commitments to attend the device tree track (the conference committee
> is looking at attendee interest and commitments as part of the process
> of accepting the device tree track).

I plan to attend. I'm probably attending some of the Android mini conf
too, so I'll have to split my time.

> 4) Identifying additional people who should attend the device tree track.

Arnd Bergmann
Matt Porter
Jon Loeliger
Gaurav Minocha

Rob

> The desired outcome of the device tree track is to encourage the future
> development of tools, process, etc to make device tree related development,
> test, review and system administration more efficient, faster, easier, more
> robust, and to improve troubleshooting and debugging facilities. Some
> examples of areas of interest could include:
> - make it easier to create correct device tree source files
> - support for debugging incorrect device tree source files
> - create a kernel that correctly boots one or more specific device trees
> (eg a kernel configured to include the proper drivers and subsystems)
> - create drivers that properly work for a device tree binding definition
> - create drivers that support detecting errors in the related node(s) in
> a device tree
>
> The wiki page lists additional areas of interest.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Frank Rowand
> Sony Mobile Communications
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-04-14 18:01    [W:0.294 / U:1.248 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site