lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Apr]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm-soc tree
Hi all,

On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 16:59:49 +0200 Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 2015-04-08 16:49 GMT+02:00 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>:
> > On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 07 April 2015 11:28:22 Linus Walleij wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Matthias Brugger
> >>> <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > 2015-04-07 3:12 GMT+02:00 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>:
> >>> >> Hi all,
> >>> >>
> >>> >> After merging the arm-soc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> >>> >> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> In file included from arch/arm/boot/dts/mt8135.dtsi:18:0,
> >>> >> from arch/arm/boot/dts/mt8135-evbp1.dts:16:
> >>> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/mt8135-pinfunc.h:18:40: fatal error: dt-bindings/pinctrl/mt65xx.h: No such file or directory
> >>> >> #include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/mt65xx.h>
> >>> >> ^
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Caused by commit e6f219b8ec5e ("ARM: dts: mt8135: Add pinctrl/GPIO/EINT
> >>> >> node for mt8135").
> >>> >
> >>> > This will be fixed as soon as Linus pinctrl for-next branch got merged [1].
> >>>
> >>> Hm that's unfortunate, we do not rely on merge orders.
> >>>
> >>> Either the ARM SoC tree needs to pull in the pinctrl commit
> >>> or I need to carry this patch in the pinctrl tree.
> >>>
> >>> Is this sufficiently stand-alone to be merged into my tree
> >>> or do you need to go by the former approach?
> >>
> >> Let's just delay this patch to another merge window. You can add the
> >> driver now, and we should just revert the DT node addition in arm-soc,
> >> and then we'll add it in 4.2, or come up with a better solution.
> >
> > OK. I'm not applying it then.
>
> @arnd: I will send the patch in the next merge window then. Do you
> want me to do anything else for this merge window (e.g. resend the
> pull request without the patch)?

I am still applying my reversion patch to the arm-soc tree merge ...

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-04-14 02:01    [W:0.068 / U:2.000 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site