[lkml]   [2015]   [Apr]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Use -mcount-record for dynamic ftrace
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:55:08 -0700
Andi Kleen <> wrote:

> > Interesting. But I can't accept this until I can test it. I don't have
> AFAIK that's a unique policy. I don't think any other maintainer operates
> this way.

Um, really? Other maintainers don't test patches that they maintain?
This isn't like hardware that I don't have. This could certainly affect
people if it breaks, and I will be responsible to fix it. I'm not going
to do that until I have a setup where I can test things that break.

> > I wonder who's responsible for
> >
> >
> > If they can add a i386/x86_64 build for gcc5 I'll be happy to download
> > it and test this patch.
> That doesn't make any sense.

What, adding gcc5 to the crosstools suite? Why not?

-- Steve

 \ /
  Last update: 2015-04-14 00:41    [W:0.086 / U:0.112 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site