Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: sched: Improve load balancing in the presence of idle CPUs | From | Jason Low <> | Date | Mon, 13 Apr 2015 13:54:52 -0700 |
| |
On Fri, 2015-04-10 at 14:07 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> At this point, I also wanted to understand why we do > "nohz.next_balance++" nohz_balancer_kick()?
So this looks like something that was added to avoid nohz_balancer_kick() getting called too frequently. Otherwise, it may get called in each trigger_load_balance(), even when another CPU has already been kicked to do balancing.
| |