lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Apr]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Regression caused by using node_to_bdi()
On 04/13/2015 01:22 PM, Zhao Lei wrote:
<>
> A new bad news:
> This patch make filesystem unstable.
>

Rrrr yes sorry Lei. Why this boots my systems is not clear this is not
what I intended to write.

Here is what I meant to write (replacing the old one):
----
diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index 32a8bbd..e0375e1 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ int writeback_in_progress(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(writeback_in_progress);

-struct backing_dev_info *inode_to_bdi(struct inode *inode)
+struct backing_dev_info *__inode_to_bdi(struct inode *inode)
{
struct super_block *sb;

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ struct backing_dev_info *inode_to_bdi(struct inode *inode)
#endif
return sb->s_bdi;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(inode_to_bdi);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__inode_to_bdi);

static inline struct inode *wb_inode(struct list_head *head)
{
diff --git a/include/linux/backing-dev.h b/include/linux/backing-dev.h
index aff923a..53d97cd 100644
--- a/include/linux/backing-dev.h
+++ b/include/linux/backing-dev.h
@@ -107,7 +107,16 @@ struct backing_dev_info {
#endif
};

-struct backing_dev_info *inode_to_bdi(struct inode *inode);
+struct backing_dev_info *__inode_to_bdi(struct inode *inode);
+
+static inline
+struct backing_dev_info *inode_to_bdi(struct inode *inode)
+{
+ if (!inode || !inode->i_sb || !inode->i_sb->s_bdi)
+ return __inode_to_bdi(inode);
+
+ return inode->i_sb->s_bdi;
+}

int __must_check bdi_init(struct backing_dev_info *bdi);
void bdi_destroy(struct backing_dev_info *bdi);



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-04-13 14:41    [W:0.077 / U:1.524 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site