lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Apr]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 08:39:17PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> After merging the rcu tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allnoconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> init/main.c: In function 'rest_init':
> init/main.c:387:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'smpboot_thread_init' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> smpboot_thread_init();
> ^
>
> Caused by commit c55f6e1f6f69 ("cpu: Defer smpboot kthread unparking
> until CPU known to scheduler"). The declaration in include/linux/cpu.h
> is protected by CONFIG_SMP, its use is not.
>
> I have reverted that commit for today.

Thanks for the report Stephen, I know today is the day of b0rked
linux-next builds :-(

I think Ingo merged Paul's patch already so here's a fix ontop:

---
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 13:01:32 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] smpboot: Fix CONFIG_SMP=n build

Stephen Rothwell reported a CONFIG_SMP=n breakage with latest rcu/next.
The timing of this is very unfortunate as we've been hunting this bug
hastily over the weekend, just to be in time for the merge window.

So here's a fix ontop.

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150413203917.1e7ea535@canb.auug.org.au
---
include/linux/cpu.h | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/cpu.h b/include/linux/cpu.h
index 091badf0f6ba..bbdee1e6cf48 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpu.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpu.h
@@ -198,6 +198,10 @@ static inline void __unregister_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
{
}

+static inline void smpboot_thread_init(void)
+{
+}
+
static inline void cpu_maps_update_begin(void)
{
}
--
2.3.5
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-04-13 13:21    [W:3.135 / U:4.160 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site