lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Apr]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: Regression caused by using node_to_bdi()
Date
Hi, Boaz

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boaz Harrosh [mailto:boaz@plexistor.com]
> Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2015 10:39 PM
> To: Boaz Harrosh; Zhao Lei; 'Christoph Hellwig'
> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; 'Jan Kara'; 'Jens Axboe'; 'LKML'
> Subject: Re: Regression caused by using node_to_bdi()
>
> On 04/12/2015 02:33 PM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> > On 04/10/2015 02:25 PM, Zhao Lei wrote:
> >> Hi, Christoph Hellwig
> >>
> <>
> >>
> >> Is there some way to speed up it(inline, or some access some variant
> >> in struct directly, ...)?
> >>
> >
> > Christoph hi
> >
> > Both node_to_bdi() and sb_is_blkdev_sb() (and I_BDEV() &&
> > blk_get_backing_dev_info()) Are an exported function calls.
> >
> > Can we not make blockdev_superblock->s_bdi == NULL, and then
> > optimize-out the call to sb_is_blkdev_sb() to only that case.
> > Something like:
> >
> > ---
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c index
> > 32a8bbd..e0375e1 100644
> > --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> > +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> > @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ int writeback_in_progress(struct backing_dev_info
> > *bdi) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(writeback_in_progress);
> >
> > -struct backing_dev_info *inode_to_bdi(struct inode *inode)
> > +struct backing_dev_info *__inode_to_bdi(struct inode *inode)
> > {
> > struct super_block *sb;
> >
> > @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ struct backing_dev_info *inode_to_bdi(struct inode
> > *inode) #endif
> > return sb->s_bdi;
> > }
> > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(inode_to_bdi);
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__inode_to_bdi);
> >
> > static inline struct inode *wb_inode(struct list_head *head) { diff
> > --git a/include/linux/backing-dev.h b/include/linux/backing-dev.h
> > index aff923a..7d172f5 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/backing-dev.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/backing-dev.h
> > @@ -107,7 +107,16 @@ struct backing_dev_info { #endif };
> >
> > -struct backing_dev_info *inode_to_bdi(struct inode *inode);
> > +struct backing_dev_info *__inode_to_bdi(struct inode *inode);
> > +
> > +static inline
> > +struct backing_dev_info *inode_to_bdi(struct inode *inode) {
> > + if (!inode || !inode->i_sb)
> > + return __inode_to_bdi(inode);
> > +
> > + return inode->i_sb->s_bdi;
> > +}
> >
>
> This patch actually boots. Lei could you please test to see if it fixes your
> slowness?
>
Thanks, I'll test this patch.

Thanks
Zhaolei

> Thanks
> Boaz
>
> > int __must_check bdi_init(struct backing_dev_info *bdi); void
> > bdi_destroy(struct backing_dev_info *bdi);
> >





\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-04-13 04:01    [W:0.120 / U:2.632 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site