lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Apr]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] lto: Add __noreorder and mark initcalls __noreorder
On Thu, 9 Apr 2015 01:50:23 +0200 Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:

> > Head is spinning a bit. As this all appears to be shiny new
> > added-by-andi gcc functionality, it would be useful if we could have a
> > few more words describing what it's all about. Reordering of what with
> > respect to what and why and why is it bad. Why is gcc reordering
> > things anyway, and what's the downside of preventing this. Why is the
> > compiler reordering things rather than the linker. etc etc etc.
>
> Ok, let me try.

That was super-useful, thanks. I slurped it into the changelog -
maybe one day it will provide material for Documentation/lto-stuff.txt.

Big picture: do you have a feeling for how much benefit LTO will yield
in the kernel, if/when it's all completed?



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-04-11 00:01    [W:0.045 / U:3.164 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site