[lkml]   [2015]   [Apr]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [BUG/PATCH] kernel RNG and its secrets
On 04/10/2015 04:50 PM, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> Am Freitag, 10. April 2015, 16:46:04 schrieb Daniel Borkmann:
> Hi Daniel,
>> On 04/10/2015 04:36 PM, Stephan Mueller wrote:
>>> Am Freitag, 10. April 2015, 16:26:00 schrieb Hannes Frederic Sowa:
>> ...
>>>> I suspected a problem in how volatile with non-present output args could
>>>> be different, but this seems not to be the case.
>>>> I would contact llvm/clang mailing list and ask. Maybe there is a
>>>> problem? It seems kind of strange to me...
>> +1
>>> Do you really think this is a compiler issue?
>> If clang/LLVM advertises "GCC compatibility", then this would
>> certainly be a different behavior.
> As you wish. I will contact the clang folks. As the proposed fix is not super
> urgend, I think we can leave it until I got word from clang.

Okay, that would be good, please let us know.

I believe there's certainly effort in the direction of an official
kernel clang/LLVM support, but not officially supported yet. If we
could get some clarification on the issue, even better.

 \ /
  Last update: 2015-04-10 17:21    [W:0.084 / U:0.252 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site