lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Apr]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] kselftests: timers: Make set-timer-lat fail more gracefully for !CAP_WAKE_ALARM
From
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> I am seeing checkpatch warnings on this patch. See below.

Sorry!

> On 03/26/2015 05:31 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 03/25/2015 07:44 PM, John Stultz wrote:
>>> The set-timer-lat test fails when testing CLOCK_BOOTTIME_ALARM
>>> or CLOCK_REALTIME_ALARM when the user isn't running as root or
>>> with CAP_WAKE_ALARM.
>>>
>>> So this patch improves the error checking so we report the
>>> issue more clearly and continue rather then reporting a failure.
>>>
>>> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
>>> Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
>>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>>> Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
>
> WARNING: Duplicate signature
> #115:
> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

Fixed.

>>> ---
>>> tools/testing/selftests/timers/set-timer-lat.c | 7 +++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/set-timer-lat.c b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/set-timer-lat.c
>>> index 3ea2eff..dbc9537c 100644
>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/set-timer-lat.c
>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/set-timer-lat.c
>>> @@ -139,6 +139,13 @@ int do_timer(int clock_id, int flags)
>>>
>>> err = timer_create(clock_id, &se, &tm1);
>>> if (err) {
>>> + if ((clock_id == CLOCK_REALTIME_ALARM)
>>> + || (clock_id == CLOCK_BOOTTIME_ALARM)) {
>>
>> I dunno of there is actually a CodingStyle rule for this, but I've always seen
>> this written with the operator on the first line:
>
> Yes it would be good to fix this one as well when you re-do the patch.

Fixed.

>>
>> if ((clock_id == CLOCK_REALTIME_ALARM) ||
>> (clock_id == CLOCK_BOOTTIME_ALARM)) {
>>
>>> + printf("%-22s %s missing CAP_WAKE_ALARM? : [UNSUPPORTED]\n",
>>> + clockstring(clock_id),
>>> + flags ? "ABSTIME":"RELTIME");
>>
>
> WARNING: line over 80 characters
> #130: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/timers/set-timer-lat.c:144:
> + printf("%-22s %s missing CAP_WAKE_ALARM? : [UNSUPPORTED]\n",

This I probably will leave, as the alternative is breaking the text
string across lines, which checkpatch will also gripe about.

thanks
-john


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-04-02 06:21    [W:0.122 / U:1.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site