lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Apr]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/6] phy: miphy365x: Use the generic phy type constants in dt-bindings/phy/phy.h
On Wed, 01 Apr 2015, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Wednesday 01 April 2015 12:45 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> >
> >>Hi Kishon,
> >>On 03/31/2015 05:30 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> >>>Maxime,
> >>>
> >>>On Tuesday 31 March 2015 01:10 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >>>>On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>Hi Patrice, Maxime,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>On Monday 30 March 2015 08:47 PM, Peter Griffin wrote:
> >>>>>>Now there are generic phy type constants declared in phy.h,
> >>>>>>migrate over to
> >>>>>>using them rather than defining our own. This change has
> >>>>>>been done as one
> >>>>>>atomic commit to be bisectable.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Note: The values of the defines are the same, so there is no
> >>>>>>ABI breakage
> >>>>>>with this patch.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Signed-off-by: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org>
> >>>>>>Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> >>>>>>Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Are you okay for this patch to go via PHY tree? It modifies
> >>>>>arch/arm/boot/dts
> >>>>>/stih416.dtsi.
> >>>>
> >>>>These files need to be changed simultaneously in order to prevent
> >>>>breakage during bisection and the like. I think the best bet moving
> >>>>forward is to pull this into its own branch, tag it and send Maxime a
> >>>>pull-request to the immutable branch. It's the best way to minimise
> >>>>merge conflicts during the v4.1 merge window.
> >>>
> >>>okay. I still need an Ack from Maxime.
> >>
> >>You have my Ack.
> >>
> >>I haven't sent a pull request for STi DT files for v4.1 now, and it
> >>is too late to send one.
> >>So creating an immutable tag is not even needed in my opinion, you
> >>can just take the DT patch.
> >
> >Kishon,
> >
> >I saw that you took the MAINTAINERS patch, but not this one. If it's
> >because you are still unsure about it, I agree with Maxime, you can
> >just take this patch without fear of conflict.
>
> I've took this already
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kishon/linux-phy.git/commit/?h=next&id=76fa6deabab05688a1653c2f66224be4a3c08d6a

I missed that. Thanks for pointing it out.

--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-04-01 14:21    [W:0.113 / U:3.160 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site