Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 1 Apr 2015 12:03:26 +0200 | From | Ralf Baechle <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: Support for IMG Pistachio |
| |
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 12:29:55PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 12:29:55 +0100 > From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > To: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@chromium.org> > Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>, Ralf Baechle > <ralf@linux-mips.org>, "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" > <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" > <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>, Linux MIPS <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>, > "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ezequiel > Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@imgtec.com>, James Hartley > <james.hartley@imgtec.com>, James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: Support for IMG Pistachio > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:15 AM, Andrew Bresticker > <abrestic@chromium.org> wrote: > > > I'd like this to go through the MIPS tree with > > Linus'/Alex's ACKs if possible. > > Why? It will only help creating merge conflicts. > There seem to be no compile-related dependencies, just Kconfig > symbols, so patches using this can go in orthogonally.
It would mean all the bits for Pistachio support go through a single tree which simplifies testing and possibly fixing significantly. The conflict potencial for this series is fairly low, I think.
Ralf
| |