Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 9 Mar 2015 13:06:00 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] x86, kaslr: Use init_size instead of run_size | From | Yinghai Lu <> |
| |
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 12:35:25PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: >> Can you put back: >> " >> So need to make sure [z_extra_offset, init_size) will fit ZO, that means >> init_size need to be adjusted according to ZO size. >> That make init_size is always >= run_size. > > Why? > > We don't adjust init_size. We assign INIT_SIZE to it. Or do you want to > say that we indirectly adjust init_size through INIT_SIZE?
Yes. Just to emphasize that " We need to make sure [z_extra_offset, init_size) will fit ZO"
| |