[lkml]   [2015]   [Mar]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/1] x86/fpu: math_state_restore() should not blindly disable irqs
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Andy Lutomirski <> wrote:
> There's another problem, though: We don't have a real stack pointer
> just after syscall and just before sysexit, and therefore we *must*
> use IST for anything that can happen while we still have
> user-controlled rsp. That includes #DB, #NM, and #MC.

I think I faked myself out here. Why do #DB and #BP use IST? We
could remove a decent (large?) amount of crud if we changed that.


 \ /
  Last update: 2015-03-08 15:41    [W:0.088 / U:1.248 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site