Messages in this thread | | | From | "Wang, Xiaoming" <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH v5] modify the IO_TLB_SEGSIZE and IO_TLB_DEFAULT_SIZE configurable as flexible requirement about SW-IOMMU. | Date | Mon, 9 Mar 2015 00:31:22 +0000 |
| |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [mailto:konrad.wilk@oracle.com] > Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 11:20 PM > To: Wang, Xiaoming > Cc: Jan Beulich; Liu@aserp2030.oracle.com; Zhang@aserp2030.oracle.com; > chris@chris-wilson.co.uk; david.vrabel@citrix.com; lauraa@codeaurora.org; > heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com; linux@horizon.com; Liu, Chuansheng; Zhang, > Dongxing; takahiro.akashi@linaro.org; akpm@linux-foundation.org; linux- > mips@linux-mips.org; ralf@linux-mips.org; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; > boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com; d.kasatkin@samsung.com; pebolle@tiscali.nl; > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; jkosina@suse.cz > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] modify the IO_TLB_SEGSIZE and > IO_TLB_DEFAULT_SIZE configurable as flexible requirement about SW- > IOMMU. > > . snip.. > > > Format: { <int>,force,<int>,<int>} is suitable I think. > > And fixing "force" is follow the code design previously in > setup_io_tlb_npages. > > It is a bug. It should have been smart enough to deal with the 'force' being in > any order. > > If you are willing to make a patch to fix this - either folded into this patch I > am responding to or as a seperate one - that would be most excellent! > OK, I will try to make a patch to deal with the 'force' in any order. > However, I can also do it - but my plate is full so it will take me some time to > get to it.
| |