lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Mar]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/3] devicetree: bindings: Document qcom,msm-id and qcom,board-id
From
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 8:08 AM, Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
> On Mar 5, 2015, at 7:59 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mar 5, 2015, at 1:42 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> The top level qcom,msm-id and qcom,board-id are utilized by bootloaders
>>>>> on Qualcomm MSM platforms to determine which device tree should be
>>>>> utilized and passed to the kernel.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cc: <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>
>>>>
>>>> Is this the special magic that allows qcom bootloaders to take a kernel
>>>> plus multiple DTBs and figure out which DTB to pass?
>>>>
>>>> Kevin
>>>
>>> yes
>>
>> That's a bummer.
>>
>> Luckily, the solution for upstream is still quite simple: Provide only
>> one devicetree, and it'll be used, right?
>
> We can provide only one, we still need the IDs in the DT.

How are the DTS provided? Concatenated with the kernel, or in a
wrapped data format? Or in a separate partition from the kernel?


-Olof


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-03-06 20:21    [W:0.125 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site