lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Mar]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/4] usb: Introduce Xen pvUSB backend
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 02:46:33PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 15:41 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > On 03/04/2015 03:29 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 14:19 +0000, David Vrabel wrote:
> > >> On 04/03/15 14:09, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> The main question whether it is worth to consider this alternative is
> > >>> the performance aspect. Does anyone have an idea which USB devices would
> > >>> typically be used via pvusb? I'd suspect memory sticks and USB disks
> > >>> and perhaps webcams being the most performance relevant ones. Is an
> > >>> additional copy operation of user data acceptable here?
> > >>
> > >> I have no idea. We (XenServer) have no use cases at all for USB device
> > >> passthrough.
> > >

I've seen XenServer customers asking for USB passthru functionality on IRC channels..


> > > My gut feeling is that for USB 1 and 2 the bus itself isn't fast enough
> > > that anyone would care. qdisk has acceptable for disks, so it's probably
> > > ok for usb too.
> >
> > While I can accept the bus speed reasoning, I doubt qdisk is copying
> > data between user and kernel space under normal circumstances. I think
> > disk I/Os are done using DMA to/from the user buffer directly.
>
> I thought there was at least one copy on the datapath with qdisk,
> wherever it is. But I don't know for sure.
>
> > > For usb 3 onwards, well, maybe when we care about those we'll decide
> > > that a kernel space driver is needed, but for now it seems like
> > > userspace would be ok.
> >
> > Do you have another feeling about the probability of a need to do usb 3?
> > If it is already on the horizon I wouldn't want to do the user space
> > backend now and the kernel one next year. :-)
>
> Well, what is *your* use case for USB passthru? I don't actually have
> one myself.
>
> I'd speculate that people are more interested in passing in
> low/medium/high speed devices rather than the superfast usb3 disks etc.
> But I have no reason to back that up.
>

People seem to ask/need USB passthru support for various use cases
including passing thru: webcams, video grabbers, printers, mobile broadband modems,
copy protection dongles, gaming controllers, you name it..


-- Pasi



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-03-06 12:21    [W:0.447 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site