Messages in this thread | | | From | Arnd Bergmann <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] genirq: describe IRQF_COND_SUSPEND | Date | Wed, 04 Mar 2015 23:27:37 +0100 |
| |
On Wednesday 04 March 2015 23:17:29 Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 04/03/2015 at 20:00:40 +0000, Mark Rutland wrote : > > With certain restrictions it is possible for a wakeup device to share > > and IRQ with an IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user, and the warnings introduced by > ^ an > > > > +In rare cases an IRQ can be shared between a wakeup device driver and an > > +IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user. In order for this to be safe, the wakeup device driver > > +must be able to discern spurious IRQs from genuine wakeup events (signalling > > And genuine question, should we use British English or American English > or we don't care ?
I believe most developers use Incorrect English, the second most common is American English, followed by Indian English and British English. ;-)
More seriously, just try to be consistent within one file or subsystem.
Arnd
| |