lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Mar]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] genirq: describe IRQF_COND_SUSPEND
    Date
    On Wednesday 04 March 2015 23:17:29 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
    > On 04/03/2015 at 20:00:40 +0000, Mark Rutland wrote :
    > > With certain restrictions it is possible for a wakeup device to share
    > > and IRQ with an IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user, and the warnings introduced by
    > ^ an
    >
    >
    > > +In rare cases an IRQ can be shared between a wakeup device driver and an
    > > +IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user. In order for this to be safe, the wakeup device driver
    > > +must be able to discern spurious IRQs from genuine wakeup events (signalling
    >
    > And genuine question, should we use British English or American English
    > or we don't care ?

    I believe most developers use Incorrect English, the second most common
    is American English, followed by Indian English and British English. ;-)

    More seriously, just try to be consistent within one file or subsystem.

    Arnd


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2015-03-04 23:41    [W:2.669 / U:0.092 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site