lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Mar]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: another pmem variant V2

* Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 06:14:15PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> > We can not accept it as is right now.
>
> Who is we?
>
> > We have conducted farther tests. And it messes up NUMA.
>
> Only you if you use the memmap option in weird ways.
>
> Sounds like I should simply remove the memmap= option so people don't
> abuse it. The main point is to parse the e820 tables, which works fine.

I'd be fine with that too - mind sending an updated series?

the memmap= option can be added on top of that.

Thanks,

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-03-31 19:21    [W:0.142 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site