Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 31 Mar 2015 18:44:56 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: another pmem variant V2 |
| |
* Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 06:14:15PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > > We can not accept it as is right now. > > Who is we? > > > We have conducted farther tests. And it messes up NUMA. > > Only you if you use the memmap option in weird ways. > > Sounds like I should simply remove the memmap= option so people don't > abuse it. The main point is to parse the e820 tables, which works fine.
I'd be fine with that too - mind sending an updated series?
the memmap= option can be added on top of that.
Thanks,
Ingo
| |