lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Mar]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [tip:perf/core] Revert "perf: Remove the extra validity check on nr_pages"

* Liang, Kan <kan.liang@intel.com> wrote:

> > * tip-bot for Kan Liang <tipbot@zytor.com> wrote:
> >
> > > --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> > > @@ -4446,7 +4446,7 @@ static int perf_mmap(struct file *file, struct
> > vm_area_struct *vma)
> > > * If we have rb pages ensure they're a power-of-two number, so
> > we
> > > * can do bitmasks instead of modulo.
> > > */
> > > - if (!is_power_of_2(nr_pages))
> > > + if (nr_pages != 0 && !is_power_of_2(nr_pages))
> > > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > Hm, what does is_power_of_2(0) return? It should return 0, because 0 is
> > not a power of 2!
> >
> > and if it's fixed to return 0, then the check should properly be something
> > like:
> >
> > if (!nr_pages || !is_power_of_2(nr_pages))
> >
> > or so?
>
> nr_pages == 0 is valid, we cannot return -EINVAL. Because
> vma_size = vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start;
> nr_pages = (vma_size / PAGE_SIZE) - 1;
>
> So here we only want to check is_power_of_2
> when the pages > 1 (or nr_pages > 0).

I don't think you answered my first question, on which my later
comments rely:

> > Hm, what does is_power_of_2(0) return? It should return 0, because 0 is
> > not a power of 2!

Thanks,

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-03-04 06:01    [W:0.103 / U:0.276 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site