Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Taesoo Kim <> | Subject | [PATCH 1/1] udf: block-based fs should use generic_write_end() | Date | Thu, 19 Mar 2015 23:37:59 -0400 |
| |
simple_write_end() is for non-block fs, which doesn't invoke mark_inode_dirty(). Instead, generic_write_end() correctly handles such case when i_size has changed.
Signed-off-by: Taesoo Kim <tsgatesv@gmail.com> --- fs/udf/file.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/udf/file.c b/fs/udf/file.c index 08f3555..28b1dab 100644 --- a/fs/udf/file.c +++ b/fs/udf/file.c @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ const struct address_space_operations udf_adinicb_aops = { .readpage = udf_adinicb_readpage, .writepage = udf_adinicb_writepage, .write_begin = udf_adinicb_write_begin, - .write_end = simple_write_end, + .write_end = generic_write_end, .direct_IO = udf_adinicb_direct_IO, }; -- 2.3.3
| |