Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 19 Mar 2015 12:26:11 -0400 | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH RT 2/4] Revert "timers: do not raise softirq unconditionally" |
| |
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:17:09 +0100 Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> wrote:
> (aw crap, let's go shopping)... so why is the one in timer.c ok?
It's not. Sebastian, you said there were no other cases of rt_mutexes being taken in hard irq context. Looks like timer.c has one.
So perhaps the real fix is to get that special case of ownership in hard interrupt context?
-- Steve
| |