Messages in this thread | | | From | Alexander Shishkin <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v0 01/11] stm class: Introduce an abstraction for System Trace Module devices | Date | Thu, 19 Mar 2015 16:23:07 +0200 |
| |
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> writes:
> I forgot to mention in my previous email... I think the hierarchy of > our respective tracing module along with the generic-stm probably > needs a review. > > Currently we have drivers/coresight, drivers/intel_th and drivers/stm. > > To me it doesn't scale - what happens when other architectures come > out with their own hw tracing technologies? > > I suggest we move everything under drivers/hwtracing and as such have: > > drivers/hwtracing > drivers/hwtracing/intel_ht > drivers/hwtracing/coresight > drivers/hwtracing/stm > > That way other architectures can add drivers for their own hw tracing > technology without further polluting the drivers/ directory and > concentrating everything in the same area. What's your view on that?
I wanted to suggest something similar, actually, if you don't mind moving drivers/coresight, then let's do it.
Regards, -- Alex
| |