lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Mar]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] trace, RAS: remove unnecessary const
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 08:57:56AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> That's a bit of a stretch. But sure, there's no real downside to having
> it, except that it makes one take a double take when seeing it, and
> thinking about why it would even be needed (like I did).

Why? It simply declares the contract that this argument won't be
changed. And if there's no downside, there's no need to do anything
here.

> I think you had the crazy fantasy with the above patch!

Wasn't me.

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-03-19 14:21    [W:0.055 / U:0.128 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site