lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Mar]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v10 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 04:09:33AM +0000, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2015/3/19 3:05, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Hanjun,
>
> Hi Will,
>
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:39:26PM +0000, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> >> This patch set already tested on multi platforms:
> >> - AMD Seattle board;
> >> - Cavium Thunder board;
> >> - Huawei D02 board;
> >> - Qualcomm ARM64 platform
> >>
> >> This version 10 patch set address some minor comments and collect ACKs and
> >> Reviewed-bys for v9:
> >>
> >> - new Acks from Rafael, Olof, Grant, Lorenzo
> >> - new way to handle typdef phys_cpuid_t which suggested by Rafael,
> >> but no functional change
> >> - Remove if(!phys) for early ioremappings
> >> - Rework sleep function for ARM64
> >> - Introduce linux/acpi_irq.h to hold acpi_irq_init()
> >> - Disable ACPI if not HW_REDUCED_ACPI compliant
> >> - Remove the doc of why ACPI on ARM
> > So I've had a look at the current state of this series and I think there
> > are a few immediate things left to do:
> >
> > (1) Resolve the acpi=force cmdline issue highlighted by Lorenzo and
> > Catalin
>
> Sure, it will be done after the confirmation with Ard.
>
> >
> > (2) I believe Sudeep and Lorenzo have concerns about patch 13 (SMP init),
> > so I'm assuming there will be additional patches from them that are
> > required.
>
> Sorry, I assume that it is about the print information for PSCI absent for SMP init, right?

Not only that, Sudeep has a patch to consolidate DT and ACPI SMP code,
I am working on it, I do not think it should be a blocking point, patch
coming asap on top of your series.

Lorenzo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-03-19 11:21    [W:0.211 / U:0.180 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site