Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 13 Mar 2015 22:26:59 +0100 | From | Daniel Lezcano <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: cpuidle: Unify the ARM64/ARM DT approach |
| |
On 03/13/2015 07:29 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 03:25:34PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> do you agree with this patchset ? > > In principle yes, apart from some function naming and I'm waiting for > Lorenzo's ack as well. Do you plan to upstream this directly via your > tree? If yes, I'll look in more detail and give some acks.
If you don't care, I would like to upstream via my tree because there is a couple of operations (like sharing a branch) I would like to monitor to let people build their driver on top of it: renesas and qcom.
Qcom's cpuidle driver is already implemented and waits for this patchset to be upstream (the patchset has been around long enough). And I believe the Renesas driver will be reworked to use it also.
-- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
| |