[lkml]   [2015]   [Mar]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 4/9] selftests: Add install target
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 02:15:44PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 07:18 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> > On 03/10/2015 10:06 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > This adds make install support to selftests. The basic usage is:
> > >
> > > v3: Rebase onto 4.0-rc2.
> > > Rename to
> > > Add --no-print-directory to emit_tests invocation.
> > > v4: Rebase onto 4.0-rc3, add TEST_FILES to efivars and vm tests, remove
> > > newlines from echoes.
> >
> > I don't see my comments addressed. If you want me to take
> > this work, please address the following comments:
> >
> > - Name install directory kselftest. It should work with the
> > the use-case.
> >
> > make INSTALL_PATH=/tmp make install
> > The install directory should be /tmp/kselftest
> >
> > - Flatten the directory with all tests under /tmp/kselftest
> >
> > I am wasting lot of time because you don't fully address my
> > comments and send patches that dont' work correctly. Please
> > make sure your patches don't generate work for me.
> You're wasting a lot of time? You have got to be kidding me. You are wasting a
> lot of *my* time.
> You have my patches, they're signed off, you can do what you wish with them.
> Good luck.

This is getting silly. We've spent three months arguing over shell
scripts and makefiles for what should be a trivial feature.
We make fundamental changes to the VM code with less contention.

It's not helped that timezones are working against everyone here,
so even minor changes end up taking a while to get reposted, re-reviewed
etc, but the level of pushback because something isn't perfect is absurd,
especially when we're talking about new features.

If you want the in-kernel variant to be perfect every step of the way,
and move slowly and never introduce subtle breakage along the way that then
gets fixed up in subsequent changes, maybe a faster moving external project
that syncs up with the kernel tree is the way forward.

If kselftests is going to evolve into something useful, something has to change.


 \ /
  Last update: 2015-03-13 17:41    [W:0.084 / U:4.684 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site