[lkml]   [2015]   [Mar]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3 RFC] ath10k: wmi: match wait_for_completion_timeout return type
Nicholas Mc Guire <> writes:

> Return type of wait_for_completion_timeout is unsigned long not int.
> An appropriately named unsigned long is added and the assignments fixed up.
> Rather than returning 0 (timeout) or a more or less random remaining time
> (completion success) this return 0 or 1 which also resolves the type of the
> functions being int.
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <>

Why does patch 2 in this patchset have RFC in the title but patches 1
and 3 not? That just makes me confused, I can't tell what you want me to
do with the patches. Normally I just drop all patches (or patchsets)
which have RFC, and that's what I'm going to do now.

To save everyone's time, when submitting something please state clearly
what's your intention.

Kalle Valo

 \ /
  Last update: 2015-03-13 17:41    [W:0.036 / U:0.676 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site