Messages in this thread | | | From | Kalle Valo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/3 RFC] ath10k: wmi: match wait_for_completion_timeout return type | Date | Fri, 13 Mar 2015 18:20:01 +0200 |
| |
Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org> writes:
> Return type of wait_for_completion_timeout is unsigned long not int. > An appropriately named unsigned long is added and the assignments fixed up. > Rather than returning 0 (timeout) or a more or less random remaining time > (completion success) this return 0 or 1 which also resolves the type of the > functions being int. > > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org>
Why does patch 2 in this patchset have RFC in the title but patches 1 and 3 not? That just makes me confused, I can't tell what you want me to do with the patches. Normally I just drop all patches (or patchsets) which have RFC, and that's what I'm going to do now.
To save everyone's time, when submitting something please state clearly what's your intention.
-- Kalle Valo
| |