lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Mar]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 21/30] PCI: Introduce pci_bus_child_max_busnr()
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 09:28:30PM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
> On 2015/3/12 11:36, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:34:18AM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
> >> Sometimes, we need to know the highest reserved
> >> busnr for children bus. Because parent's
> >> bus->busn_res could have padding in it.
> >> This function return the max child busnr as
> >> pci_scan_child_bus().
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> >
> > I must have screwed this up. I don't know where the Signed-off-by from
> > Fengguang came from, but it shouldn't be there. And I also screwed up by
> > adding my own Signed-off-by to the branch while we're still iterating on
> > this series. The patches you post should not have my Signed-off-by in
> > them; I should add that. But that's my fault because put them in the
> > branch, and I asked you to pull that branch and modify and repost it.
> >
>
> -.-! I added the Fengguang Signed-off-by, because his kbuild test robot sent a patch to me to fix a building error.

Oh, OK. I forgot about that. I think it's OK to include Fengguang's
Signed-off-by for that, but it should come before yours. Since you're the
one sending the patch, your Signed-off-by should be last in the list.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-03-12 21:21    [W:0.109 / U:1.336 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site