lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Mar]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/12] Increased clocksource validation and cleanups (v4)

* John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote:

> So here is another round of this series, which is the result of
> earlier discussions with Linus and his suggestions around
> improvements to clocksource validation in the hope we can more
> easily catch bad hardware.
>
> There's also a few cleanups Linus suggested as well as a few I've been
> meaning to get to for awhile.
>
> I tried in address all the feedback that had been given, adding
> the checks behind CONFIG_DEBUG_TIMEKEEPING. I also sorted out a
> sane way to print rate-limited warnings if we see cycle deltas that
> are too large, or if they look like small underflows.
>
> I'd like to get this queued into -tip soon so it can get as much
> testing in -next as possible.
>
> If there are any objections or feedback, I'd love to hear it!
>
> New in v4:
> * Lots and lots of typo corrections and minor cleanups suggested
> by Ingo.
> * Dropped "Remove clocksource_max_deferment()" patch
> * Added "Rename __clocksource_updatefreq_*..." patch
> * I realized one of the patches (Improve clocksource watchdog
> reporting) didn't have a proper cc list, so while it was on lkml
> folks may not have reviewed it before.

So I've applied them with some changes to tip:timers/core, please look
at the commit notifications for details. Any outstanding review
feedback can be addressed as delta patches on top of this I think,
none of my observations were show-stoppers.

Thanks,

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-03-12 10:41    [W:0.138 / U:21.056 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site